Infosys Co-Founder Kris Gopalakrishnan Among 18 Booked in Caste Discrimination Case in Bengaluru
In a surprising turn of events, Bengaluru’s law enforcement has filed charges against Kris Gopalakrishnan, the co-founder of Infosys, and 17 others in a caste discrimination case linked to the Indian Institute of Science (IISc). The allegations stem from a complaint filed by Sanna Durgappa, a former assistant professor at IISc’s Centre for Sustainable Technology. This legal action comes after a directive from the 71st City Civil and Sessions Court (CCH).
Caste Discrimination Allegations Against IISc Officials
Durgappa, a member of the Bovi community, alleges that he was subjected to caste-based discrimination and abuse during his tenure at IISc. The complainant claims that his dismissal from the institution in 2014 was a result of being falsely implicated in a honey trap case. The case took a new twist when Durgappa contended that it was orchestrated with malicious intent, rooted in his caste identity, leading to his wrongful termination.
“I was subjected to constant humiliation and discrimination because of my caste. They falsely accused me in the honey trap case, and it led to my unceremonious dismissal,” said Durgappa in a statement following the complaint.
Kris Gopalakrishnan’s Role and IISc’s Involvement
Kris Gopalakrishnan, a renowned figure in the tech industry and a member of IISc’s Board of Trustees, has been implicated in the case, despite his influence and stature. The charges also extend to IISc’s former director, Balaram P, and several other high-ranking officials who were allegedly involved in the discriminatory practices.
The charges have rocked the academic community, with many questioning how such an issue could arise within an institution of IISc’s repute. Gopalakrishnan, who has previously been an advocate for diversity and inclusion in corporate settings, is yet to comment on the allegations.
Legal Framework: SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act
The case has been filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, which aims to prevent atrocities and discrimination against individuals belonging to scheduled castes and tribes. If proven, the charges could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the accused.
Legal experts suggest that the outcome of this case may set a precedent for future caste discrimination complaints in educational and research institutions across the country. The act carries stringent penalties for those found guilty of violating its provisions, including imprisonment.
IISc’s Reputation and Future Implications
IISc, known for its academic excellence and contributions to research and innovation, is now under the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. The institution’s leadership, especially its board of trustees, is likely to face scrutiny regarding their handling of internal complaints and workplace dynamics.
The ongoing investigation is expected to bring more clarity on the depth of the caste discrimination issue within IISc and could lead to significant changes in the institution’s policies and practices to ensure a more inclusive environment for faculty members from all backgrounds.
Leave a Reply